<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networks, E-mail and User Behavior</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is E-Mail Dead? A Millennial Weighs In &#124; VirtualWayfarer</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>Is E-Mail Dead? A Millennial Weighs In &#124; VirtualWayfarer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=211#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>[...] primary source for communication?  This post is a follow up to another piece I wrote entitled; Social Networks, E-mail and User Behavior in August of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] primary source for communication?  This post is a follow up to another piece I wrote entitled; Social Networks, E-mail and User Behavior in August of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gen-xr</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>gen-xr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=211#comment-695</guid>
		<description>This is such bs. Gen this or that do not use anything different than the other. But people like my gen X. Had Aol, mirc and such. myspace, facebook is nothing more than the new aol of old. you had a profile, private message (email) chat feature. only difference is these social aspects are no longer tied to the isp since high speed internet opened up the web. Not one gen uses these things different. the gen doesnt say how things will be used, the technology does. Although older gens on the web are probably more bored and seen it all however they  spin it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such bs. Gen this or that do not use anything different than the other. But people like my gen X. Had Aol, mirc and such. myspace, facebook is nothing more than the new aol of old. you had a profile, private message (email) chat feature. only difference is these social aspects are no longer tied to the isp since high speed internet opened up the web. Not one gen uses these things different. the gen doesnt say how things will be used, the technology does. Although older gens on the web are probably more bored and seen it all however they  spin it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gen-xr</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/#comment-1752</link>
		<dc:creator>gen-xr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=211#comment-1752</guid>
		<description>This is such bs. Gen this or that do not use anything different than the other. But people like my gen X. Had Aol, mirc and such. myspace, facebook is nothing more than the new aol of old. you had a profile, private message (email) chat feature. only difference is these social aspects are no longer tied to the isp since high speed internet opened up the web. Not one gen uses these things different. the gen doesnt say how things will be used, the technology does. Although older gens on the web are probably more bored and seen it all however they  spin it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such bs. Gen this or that do not use anything different than the other. But people like my gen X. Had Aol, mirc and such. myspace, facebook is nothing more than the new aol of old. you had a profile, private message (email) chat feature. only difference is these social aspects are no longer tied to the isp since high speed internet opened up the web. Not one gen uses these things different. the gen doesnt say how things will be used, the technology does. Although older gens on the web are probably more bored and seen it all however they  spin it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fundraising&#8230; al piccolo trotto &#171; Fundraising Now!</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Fundraising&#8230; al piccolo trotto &#171; Fundraising Now!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 17:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=211#comment-497</guid>
		<description>[...] su Internet. Se l&#8217;email, almeno fra le nuove generazioni, sembra arretrare vistosamente (leggetevi questo contributo di un giovanissimo blogger su come si entra in rete negli States), è nei Social Network, canali di per se conversazionali, che si farà la differenza nei prossimi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] su Internet. Se l&#8217;email, almeno fra le nuove generazioni, sembra arretrare vistosamente (leggetevi questo contributo di un giovanissimo blogger su come si entra in rete negli States), è nei Social Network, canali di per se conversazionali, che si farà la differenza nei prossimi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Berger</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=211#comment-496</guid>
		<description>Alphonse,

Thanks for your fantastic feedback.  Great information about your co-workers behavior.  

I agree with you that a lot of the discourse still takes a very &quot;in the box&quot; approach. I&#039;m currently working on a post about education which I believe will really help shed light on this.

Your last question is a great one. The last several months i&#039;ve really been focusing on exploring early adopters and the benefits of blogs, twitter, and the like as a social networking tool.

I have 600 some odd facebook friends.  Many of which I made in college. I met these individuals through a multitude of channels. The river, salsa dancing, business clubs, lectures, the bars, take your pick.  

The best part is, that because they were contacts made during College they are all over the place.  Many returned home and for some that meant other countries. All come from a melting pot of professions and focuses. So, instead of the usual profession/interest based community I have contacts who are bio engineers, lit majors, political analysts, dance majors, artists, business majors - take your pick. 

I can tap each of these individuals for expert advice in their field, get feedback from hundreds of varied perspectives, and share opportunities I come across literally globally.   So, I think that, when acted upon, we enter the professional world with a giant Rolodex.  The trick is deciding how to use it and how to make the transition from strictly social, to social/professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alphonse,</p>
<p>Thanks for your fantastic feedback.  Great information about your co-workers behavior.  </p>
<p>I agree with you that a lot of the discourse still takes a very &#8220;in the box&#8221; approach. I&#8217;m currently working on a post about education which I believe will really help shed light on this.</p>
<p>Your last question is a great one. The last several months i&#8217;ve really been focusing on exploring early adopters and the benefits of blogs, twitter, and the like as a social networking tool.</p>
<p>I have 600 some odd facebook friends.  Many of which I made in college. I met these individuals through a multitude of channels. The river, salsa dancing, business clubs, lectures, the bars, take your pick.  </p>
<p>The best part is, that because they were contacts made during College they are all over the place.  Many returned home and for some that meant other countries. All come from a melting pot of professions and focuses. So, instead of the usual profession/interest based community I have contacts who are bio engineers, lit majors, political analysts, dance majors, artists, business majors &#8211; take your pick. </p>
<p>I can tap each of these individuals for expert advice in their field, get feedback from hundreds of varied perspectives, and share opportunities I come across literally globally.   So, I think that, when acted upon, we enter the professional world with a giant Rolodex.  The trick is deciding how to use it and how to make the transition from strictly social, to social/professional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Berger</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=211#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>Alphonse,

Thanks for your fantastic feedback.  Great information about your co-workers behavior.  

I agree with you that a lot of the discourse still takes a very &quot;in the box&quot; approach. I&#039;m currently working on a post about education which I believe will really help shed light on this.

Your last question is a great one. The last several months i&#039;ve really been focusing on exploring early adopters and the benefits of blogs, twitter, and the like as a social networking tool.

I have 600 some odd facebook friends.  Many of which I made in college. I met these individuals through a multitude of channels. The river, salsa dancing, business clubs, lectures, the bars, take your pick.  

The best part is, that because they were contacts made during College they are all over the place.  Many returned home and for some that meant other countries. All come from a melting pot of professions and focuses. So, instead of the usual profession/interest based community I have contacts who are bio engineers, lit majors, political analysts, dance majors, artists, business majors - take your pick. 

I can tap each of these individuals for expert advice in their field, get feedback from hundreds of varied perspectives, and share opportunities I come across literally globally.   So, I think that, when acted upon, we enter the professional world with a giant Rolodex.  The trick is deciding how to use it and how to make the transition from strictly social, to social/professional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alphonse,</p>
<p>Thanks for your fantastic feedback.  Great information about your co-workers behavior.  </p>
<p>I agree with you that a lot of the discourse still takes a very &#8220;in the box&#8221; approach. I&#8217;m currently working on a post about education which I believe will really help shed light on this.</p>
<p>Your last question is a great one. The last several months i&#8217;ve really been focusing on exploring early adopters and the benefits of blogs, twitter, and the like as a social networking tool.</p>
<p>I have 600 some odd facebook friends.  Many of which I made in college. I met these individuals through a multitude of channels. The river, salsa dancing, business clubs, lectures, the bars, take your pick.  </p>
<p>The best part is, that because they were contacts made during College they are all over the place.  Many returned home and for some that meant other countries. All come from a melting pot of professions and focuses. So, instead of the usual profession/interest based community I have contacts who are bio engineers, lit majors, political analysts, dance majors, artists, business majors &#8211; take your pick. </p>
<p>I can tap each of these individuals for expert advice in their field, get feedback from hundreds of varied perspectives, and share opportunities I come across literally globally.   So, I think that, when acted upon, we enter the professional world with a giant Rolodex.  The trick is deciding how to use it and how to make the transition from strictly social, to social/professional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alphonse Ha</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>Alphonse Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=211#comment-494</guid>
		<description>I have been reading so much on social media that I forget where I learned what but I&#039;ve read (It could of been here) that generation x tend to use social networks as a professional networking tool rather than a social tool and us gen-yers use the social networks how they are meant to be used when they were first created.

Accordingly, I think your post illustrates why that it very well.  We grew up using mIRC, ICQ, AIM, MSN as a social tool not simply a communication tool.  Thus, it is normal for us to use Facebook socially because it was a normal evolution.

After reading your post, I asked a few co-workers (older gen-yers (27-28)) about their Internet use and first encounters and the ones who did not socialized through &quot;chat&quot; (mIRC etc) do not use Facebook daily.  Most if not all of them use it to watch pictures of their friends rather than communicating/socializing through Facebook.

Gen-x on the other hand do not socialize at all.  I am following a lot of social media slash web 2.0 gurus or experts or evangelists and although they use and understand social media very well, their use seems very impersonal to me.  

Another thing I would like to point out is that for us, the ones who grew up with mIRC ect, for the most part, just got out of school therefore we don&#039;t have a professional network and life like the gen-xers who have been on the work force for 10+ years.  That also factors in the equation.

What is interesting to me is that knowing all this... How will the young gen-yers like you and me and especially the gen-zers (?) will network through social media or the web in feneral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading so much on social media that I forget where I learned what but I&#8217;ve read (It could of been here) that generation x tend to use social networks as a professional networking tool rather than a social tool and us gen-yers use the social networks how they are meant to be used when they were first created.</p>
<p>Accordingly, I think your post illustrates why that it very well.  We grew up using mIRC, ICQ, AIM, MSN as a social tool not simply a communication tool.  Thus, it is normal for us to use Facebook socially because it was a normal evolution.</p>
<p>After reading your post, I asked a few co-workers (older gen-yers (27-28)) about their Internet use and first encounters and the ones who did not socialized through &#8220;chat&#8221; (mIRC etc) do not use Facebook daily.  Most if not all of them use it to watch pictures of their friends rather than communicating/socializing through Facebook.</p>
<p>Gen-x on the other hand do not socialize at all.  I am following a lot of social media slash web 2.0 gurus or experts or evangelists and although they use and understand social media very well, their use seems very impersonal to me.  </p>
<p>Another thing I would like to point out is that for us, the ones who grew up with mIRC ect, for the most part, just got out of school therefore we don&#8217;t have a professional network and life like the gen-xers who have been on the work force for 10+ years.  That also factors in the equation.</p>
<p>What is interesting to me is that knowing all this&#8230; How will the young gen-yers like you and me and especially the gen-zers (?) will network through social media or the web in feneral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alphonse Ha</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>Alphonse Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=211#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>I have been reading so much on social media that I forget where I learned what but I&#039;ve read (It could of been here) that generation x tend to use social networks as a professional networking tool rather than a social tool and us gen-yers use the social networks how they are meant to be used when they were first created.

Accordingly, I think your post illustrates why that it very well.  We grew up using mIRC, ICQ, AIM, MSN as a social tool not simply a communication tool.  Thus, it is normal for us to use Facebook socially because it was a normal evolution.

After reading your post, I asked a few co-workers (older gen-yers (27-28)) about their Internet use and first encounters and the ones who did not socialized through &quot;chat&quot; (mIRC etc) do not use Facebook daily.  Most if not all of them use it to watch pictures of their friends rather than communicating/socializing through Facebook.

Gen-x on the other hand do not socialize at all.  I am following a lot of social media slash web 2.0 gurus or experts or evangelists and although they use and understand social media very well, their use seems very impersonal to me.  

Another thing I would like to point out is that for us, the ones who grew up with mIRC ect, for the most part, just got out of school therefore we don&#039;t have a professional network and life like the gen-xers who have been on the work force for 10+ years.  That also factors in the equation.

What is interesting to me is that knowing all this... How will the young gen-yers like you and me and especially the gen-zers (?) will network through social media or the web in feneral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been reading so much on social media that I forget where I learned what but I&#8217;ve read (It could of been here) that generation x tend to use social networks as a professional networking tool rather than a social tool and us gen-yers use the social networks how they are meant to be used when they were first created.</p>
<p>Accordingly, I think your post illustrates why that it very well.  We grew up using mIRC, ICQ, AIM, MSN as a social tool not simply a communication tool.  Thus, it is normal for us to use Facebook socially because it was a normal evolution.</p>
<p>After reading your post, I asked a few co-workers (older gen-yers (27-28)) about their Internet use and first encounters and the ones who did not socialized through &#8220;chat&#8221; (mIRC etc) do not use Facebook daily.  Most if not all of them use it to watch pictures of their friends rather than communicating/socializing through Facebook.</p>
<p>Gen-x on the other hand do not socialize at all.  I am following a lot of social media slash web 2.0 gurus or experts or evangelists and although they use and understand social media very well, their use seems very impersonal to me.  </p>
<p>Another thing I would like to point out is that for us, the ones who grew up with mIRC ect, for the most part, just got out of school therefore we don&#8217;t have a professional network and life like the gen-xers who have been on the work force for 10+ years.  That also factors in the equation.</p>
<p>What is interesting to me is that knowing all this&#8230; How will the young gen-yers like you and me and especially the gen-zers (?) will network through social media or the web in feneral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kavanagh</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Kavanagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=211#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Regarding your statement &quot;As technology continues to evolve, so too will our reliance on virtual mediums to facilitate communication.&quot;

As a designer of a new breed of &quot;software toys&quot; (&quot;Clicktoy - The Meadow&quot; specifically), I agree that interactive entertainment, social networks, and online worlds are indeed the kindergarten technologies for tomorrow&#039;s generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your statement &#8220;As technology continues to evolve, so too will our reliance on virtual mediums to facilitate communication.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a designer of a new breed of &#8220;software toys&#8221; (&#8220;Clicktoy &#8211; The Meadow&#8221; specifically), I agree that interactive entertainment, social networks, and online worlds are indeed the kindergarten technologies for tomorrow&#8217;s generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kavanagh</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/exploring-social-networks-and-e-mail/#comment-1749</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Kavanagh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=211#comment-1749</guid>
		<description>Regarding your statement &quot;As technology continues to evolve, so too will our reliance on virtual mediums to facilitate communication.&quot;

As a designer of a new breed of &quot;software toys&quot; (&quot;Clicktoy - The Meadow&quot; specifically), I agree that interactive entertainment, social networks, and online worlds are indeed the kindergarten technologies for tomorrow&#039;s generation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding your statement &#8220;As technology continues to evolve, so too will our reliance on virtual mediums to facilitate communication.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a designer of a new breed of &#8220;software toys&#8221; (&#8220;Clicktoy &#8211; The Meadow&#8221; specifically), I agree that interactive entertainment, social networks, and online worlds are indeed the kindergarten technologies for tomorrow&#8217;s generation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

