<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Technological Revolution &#8211; A 2nd Look</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtualwayfarer.com/the-technological-revolution-a-2nd-look/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/the-technological-revolution-a-2nd-look/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 01:43:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Berger</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/the-technological-revolution-a-2nd-look/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citadel-of-light.com/2008/06/16/the-technological-revolution-a-2nd-look/#comment-692</guid>
		<description>Ryan, 

Thank you for the post.  You are partially correct. While I hate to cite Wikipedia, you&#039;re welcome to spot check the factual accuracy on Britanica (linked below) or any other source.

From Wikipedia:
&quot;The First Industrial Revolution, which began in the eighteenth century, merged into the Second Industrial Revolution around 1850, when technological and economic progress gained momentum with the development of steam-powered ships, railways, and later in the nineteenth century with the internal combustion engine and electrical power generation.

The period of time covered by the Industrial Revolution varies with different historians. Eric Hobsbawm held that it &#039;broke out&#039; in the 1780s and was not fully felt until the 1830s or 1840s,[4] while T. S. Ashton held that it occurred roughly between 1760 and 1830.[5] Some twentieth century historians such as John Clapham and Nicholas Crafts have argued that the process of economic and social change took place gradually and the term revolution is not a true description of what took place. This is still a subject of debate amongst historians.[6][7]&quot;


Britanica:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/287086/Industrial-Revolution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, </p>
<p>Thank you for the post.  You are partially correct. While I hate to cite Wikipedia, you&#8217;re welcome to spot check the factual accuracy on Britanica (linked below) or any other source.</p>
<p>From Wikipedia:<br />
&#8220;The First Industrial Revolution, which began in the eighteenth century, merged into the Second Industrial Revolution around 1850, when technological and economic progress gained momentum with the development of steam-powered ships, railways, and later in the nineteenth century with the internal combustion engine and electrical power generation.</p>
<p>The period of time covered by the Industrial Revolution varies with different historians. Eric Hobsbawm held that it &#8216;broke out&#8217; in the 1780s and was not fully felt until the 1830s or 1840s,[4] while T. S. Ashton held that it occurred roughly between 1760 and 1830.[5] Some twentieth century historians such as John Clapham and Nicholas Crafts have argued that the process of economic and social change took place gradually and the term revolution is not a true description of what took place. This is still a subject of debate amongst historians.[6][7]&#8221;</p>
<p>Britanica:<br />
<a href="http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/287086/Industrial-Revolution" rel="nofollow">http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/287086/Industrial-Revolution</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan brevard</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/the-technological-revolution-a-2nd-look/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan brevard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citadel-of-light.com/2008/06/16/the-technological-revolution-a-2nd-look/#comment-691</guid>
		<description>the industrial revolution began in 1860, not 1760.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the industrial revolution began in 1860, not 1760.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The upside to the 250GB Comcast cap - If we fight for it! &#124; VirtualWayfarer.com &#124; A Place For Intellectual Musings</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/the-technological-revolution-a-2nd-look/comment-page-1/#comment-654</link>
		<dc:creator>The upside to the 250GB Comcast cap - If we fight for it! &#124; VirtualWayfarer.com &#124; A Place For Intellectual Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citadel-of-light.com/2008/06/16/the-technological-revolution-a-2nd-look/#comment-654</guid>
		<description>[...] see my past Part I &amp; 2 posts on the Technological (Digital) Revolution available here and here.  I would also like to take a moment to be very clear.  While I am pointing out a potential [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see my past Part I &amp; 2 posts on the Technological (Digital) Revolution available here and here.  I would also like to take a moment to be very clear.  While I am pointing out a potential [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
