<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Arizona Leave McCain Seeing Blue This November?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Berger</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/#comment-752</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=310#comment-752</guid>
		<description>1. There&#039;s a big difference between a non-partisan organization set to lobby for a specific agenda and a non-partisan organization who&#039;s specific charter is the non-partisan fact checking of political claims.

2. Look at the debate coverage etc. they&#039;re just as hard on Obama as they are on McCain. The same goes for Politifact.com

3. Factcheck has been found credible enough for use by a number of major publications.  One of their spokespeople was on NPR the other day, they&#039;re mentioned and cited in most major news publications etc.

If you&#039;ve found a better resource for non-partisan fact checking please share it. Worst case scenario you might have to actually spend some time researching the citations used in the fact-checking summaries which both sites typically document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. There&#8217;s a big difference between a non-partisan organization set to lobby for a specific agenda and a non-partisan organization who&#8217;s specific charter is the non-partisan fact checking of political claims.</p>
<p>2. Look at the debate coverage etc. they&#8217;re just as hard on Obama as they are on McCain. The same goes for Politifact.com</p>
<p>3. Factcheck has been found credible enough for use by a number of major publications.  One of their spokespeople was on NPR the other day, they&#8217;re mentioned and cited in most major news publications etc.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve found a better resource for non-partisan fact checking please share it. Worst case scenario you might have to actually spend some time researching the citations used in the fact-checking summaries which both sites typically document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Berger</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=310#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>1. There&#039;s a big difference between a non-partisan organization set to lobby for a specific agenda and a non-partisan organization who&#039;s specific charter is the non-partisan fact checking of political claims.

2. Look at the debate coverage etc. they&#039;re just as hard on Obama as they are on McCain. The same goes for Politifact.com

3. Factcheck has been found credible enough for use by a number of major publications.  One of their spokespeople was on NPR the other day, they&#039;re mentioned and cited in most major news publications etc.

If you&#039;ve found a better resource for non-partisan fact checking please share it. Worst case scenario you might have to actually spend some time researching the citations used in the fact-checking summaries which both sites typically document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. There&#8217;s a big difference between a non-partisan organization set to lobby for a specific agenda and a non-partisan organization who&#8217;s specific charter is the non-partisan fact checking of political claims.</p>
<p>2. Look at the debate coverage etc. they&#8217;re just as hard on Obama as they are on McCain. The same goes for Politifact.com</p>
<p>3. Factcheck has been found credible enough for use by a number of major publications.  One of their spokespeople was on NPR the other day, they&#8217;re mentioned and cited in most major news publications etc.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve found a better resource for non-partisan fact checking please share it. Worst case scenario you might have to actually spend some time researching the citations used in the fact-checking summaries which both sites typically document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Stewart</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/#comment-751</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=310#comment-751</guid>
		<description>last I checked the NRA was listed as a nonpartisan group. Factcheck might be nonpartisan, but that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s balanced, or unbiased, much like the NRA. haven&#039;t read much from politifact, I&#039;ll have to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>last I checked the NRA was listed as a nonpartisan group. Factcheck might be nonpartisan, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s balanced, or unbiased, much like the NRA. haven&#8217;t read much from politifact, I&#8217;ll have to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Stewart</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/#comment-1854</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=310#comment-1854</guid>
		<description>last I checked the NRA was listed as a nonpartisan group. Factcheck might be nonpartisan, but that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s balanced, or unbiased, much like the NRA. haven&#039;t read much from politifact, I&#039;ll have to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>last I checked the NRA was listed as a nonpartisan group. Factcheck might be nonpartisan, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s balanced, or unbiased, much like the NRA. haven&#8217;t read much from politifact, I&#8217;ll have to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Berger</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/#comment-730</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=310#comment-730</guid>
		<description>Key word: Non-partisan. Further, as far as political fact checking goes? The two listed are two of the best/most even handed available to the average voter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key word: Non-partisan. Further, as far as political fact checking goes? The two listed are two of the best/most even handed available to the average voter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Berger</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/#comment-1853</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=310#comment-1853</guid>
		<description>Key word: Non-partisan. Further, as far as political fact checking goes? The two listed are two of the best/most even handed available to the average voter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key word: Non-partisan. Further, as far as political fact checking goes? The two listed are two of the best/most even handed available to the average voter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Stewart</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=310#comment-729</guid>
		<description>you seriously think factcheck isn&#039;t biased?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you seriously think factcheck isn&#8217;t biased?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Stewart</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/#comment-1852</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=310#comment-1852</guid>
		<description>you seriously think factcheck isn&#039;t biased?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you seriously think factcheck isn&#8217;t biased?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Berger</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/#comment-717</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=310#comment-717</guid>
		<description>Linda! Excellent point.

Kyle - fantastic thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda! Excellent point.</p>
<p>Kyle &#8211; fantastic thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Berger</title>
		<link>http://virtualwayfarer.com/will-arizona-vote-blue-in-2008/#comment-1851</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Berger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://virtualwayfarer.com/?p=310#comment-1851</guid>
		<description>Linda! Excellent point.

Kyle - fantastic thoughts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda! Excellent point.</p>
<p>Kyle &#8211; fantastic thoughts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

